The High Middle Ages and Europe (1000 to 1250)

Click here to return to the Whirlwind World History Curriculum Online Textbook table of contents.

Historians sometimes refer to the period between approximately 1000 and 1250 CE as the “high” Middle Ages to emphasize its dynamism, creativity, and importance in setting the stage for subsequent historical developments.  During the high Middle Ages the European economy greatly expanded, leading to a revived cash economy and widespread trade and commerce.  Towns and cities grew, and with them new centers of learning emerged.  While still highly decentralized by the standards of later periods, kingdoms did start the gradual process of transforming into more highly organized states.  Europe also re-engaged in significant ways with its neighboring regions, leading to both an influx of foreign trade goods and, unfortunately, tremendous bloodshed in the form of the crusades.

The Normans

Rollo settled in Normandy (911)

As discussed in the previous section, a viking named Rollo settled in Normandy. He was given those lands in a treaty which offered Rollo and his men the French coastal lands along the English Channel between the river Epte and the Atlantic Ocean coast in exchange for their protection against further Viking incursions.

Optional: Use the following embedded map to locate the Epte River. You will have to zoom in to see it. Hint: Look near Gournay-en-Bray or Gisors. What river is the Epte a tributary of?

Art Diversion:

Monet’s Water Lilies series was created and inspired by diverting a branch of the Epte to a section of his gardens.

As well as promising to protect the area of Rouen from Viking invasion, Rollo swore not to invade further Frankish lands himself, accepted baptism and conversion to Christianity and swore fealty to King Charles III (also known as Charles the Simple). Robert I of France stood as godfather during Rollo’s baptism. He became the first Duke of Normandy and Count of Rouen.

The territory was roughly equivalent to the old province of Rouen, and reproduced the old Roman Empire’s administrative structure of one its previous provinces. The descendants of Vikings replaced the Norse religion and Old Norse language with Christianity and the language of the local people, descending from the Latin of the Romans. The Norman language (Norman French) was forged by the adoption of the indigenous branch of language by a Norse-speaking ruling class, and it developed into the French regional languages that survive today.

The new Norman rulers were culturally and ethnically distinct from the old French aristocracy, most of whom traced their lineage to the Franks of the Carolingian dynasty from the days of Charlemagne in the 9th century. Most Norman knights remained poor and land-hungry. Many Normans of Italy, France and England eventually served as avid Crusaders soldiers.

The Normans were in contact with England from an early date. Not only were their original Viking brethren still ravaging the English coasts, they occupied most of the important ports opposite England across the English Channel. This relationship eventually produced closer ties of blood through a marriage, but we’ll get to that in a bit. 🙂

Meanwhile, in England…

After Alfred the Great died, his son Edward became king of Wessex in 899. Edward conquered Viking-ruled southern England in partnership with his sister Æthelflæd, who had succeeded as Lady of the Mercians following the death of her husband in 911 (her father Alfred had given her in marriage to Ethelred the ruler of Eastern Mercia). There was a general submission of rulers in Britain to Edward in 920, but the Vikings still controlled The Kingdom of York (Jórvík).

Æthelstan (ruled from 924-927)

Edward’s son Æthelstan conquered the last remaining Viking kingdom, York, making him the first Anglo-Saxon ruler of the whole of England.

In 934, he invaded Scotland and forced the Scottish king to submit to him, but Æthelstan’s rule was resented by the Scots and Vikings, and in 937 they invaded England. Æthelstan defeated them, a victory which gave him great prestige both in the British Isles and on the Continent. After his death in 939 the Vikings seized back control of York, and it was not finally reconquered until 954.

Silver penny of King Æthelstan

Æthelstan centralized government; he increased control over the production of charters and summoned leading figures from distant areas to his councils. These meetings were also attended by rulers from outside his territory, especially Welsh kings, who acknowledged his overlordship. More legal texts survive from his reign than from any other 10th-century English king. They show his concern about widespread robberies, and the threat they posed to social order. His legal reforms built on those of his grandfather, Alfred the Great. Æthelstan was one of the most pious West Saxon kings, and was known for collecting relics and founding churches. His household was the center of English learning during his reign, and it laid the foundation for the Benedictine monastic reform later in the century. No other West Saxon king played as important a role in European politics as Æthelstan, and he arranged the marriages of several of his sisters to continental rulers. Many historians see him as the first king of England.

Note: There is a minor sexual reference toward the very end of the video.

Things are about to get soap opera crazy…

After Æthelstan was Edmund I (who only ruled for 6 years because he was killed in a brawl), then Edmund’s brother Eadred (who died at the age of 32 with no children), then Edmund’s sons Eadwig (who died 4 years after becoming king at the age of 15) and Edgar the Peaceful who came to the throne as a teen and died around the age of 32. After Edgar, there was Edgar’s son Edward (the Martyr) who was king for 3 years until he was murdered by members of his half brother’s household. He was then was succeeded by his half brother Æthelred (the Unready) who was between 9 and 12 years old when he became king in 978.

Æthelred (ruled from 978-1013 and 1014-1016), Sweyn Forkbeard (ruled England from 1013-1014) , and Cnut (ruled England from 1016-1035)

That brings us back to the Normans we discussed earlier.

In 1002, Æthelred married Emma of Normandy. Her brother was Richard II, the Duke of Normandy (the great-grandson of the Viking Rollo). Viking raids on England were often based in Normandy in the late 10th century, and for Æthelred this marriage was intended to unite against the Viking threat.

On Friday the 13th, of November 1002, Æthelred ordered the execution of all Danes living in England in response to the frequent Danish raids. Among those thought to have been killed is Gunhilde, who was the sister of Sweyn Forkbeard, the King of Denmark.

In 1013 Sweyn invaded England (possibly to avenge his sister’s death as well as to raid), and Æthelred fled to Normandy in exile with his wife Emma to her brother’s home.

Sweyn and the Jomsvikings at the funeral ale of his father Harald Bluetooth. Painting by Lorenz Frølich
Sweyn and the Jomsvikings at the funeral ale of his father Harald Bluetooth. Painting by Lorenz Frølich
Sweyn had revolted against his father and seized the throne.

The situation changed suddenly when Sweyn died just a year later in 1014. The crews of the Danish ships in the Trent that had supported Sweyn immediately swore their allegiance to Sweyn’s son Cnut the Great, but leading English noblemen sent a deputation to Æthelred in Normandy to negotiate his restoration to the throne. He was required to declare his loyalty to them, to bring in reforms regarding everything that they disliked and to forgive all that had been said and done against him in his previous reign. The terms of this agreement are of great constitutional interest in early English History as they are the first recorded pact between a King and his subjects and are also widely regarded as showing that many English noblemen had submitted to Sweyn simply because of their distrust of Æthelred.

So, in 1014, Æthelred became king again, and Sweyn’s son Cnut was defeated and returned to Denmark.

Two years later in 1016, Cnut decided to return to England and found a complex and volatile situation unfolding in England. Æthelred’s son, Edmund Ironside, had revolted against his father and established himself in the Danelaw.

Æthelred died that year, making his traitorous son Edmund king. However, Edmund was defeated by Cnut.

Edmund Ironside
Edmund Ironside

Edmund died that year and now Cnut was the king of England. Æthelred’s infant sons were sent away to Sweden to be murdered, but were spared. They were raised in Hungary and later in the Royal court of Kievan Rus.

As Danish King of England, Cnut was quick to eliminate any prospective challenge from the survivors of the mighty Wessex dynasty. The first year of his reign was marked by the executions of a number of English noblemen whom he considered suspect. Æthelred’s sons by Emma of Normandy went under the protection of their relatives in the Duchy of Normandy.

Cnut decided to marry Emma even though he was already married to Ælfgifu of Northampton. It was then regarded as acceptable to put aside one wife and take another if the first wife was acquired through the non-Christian pagan ceremony of “handfasting” and nearly always for reasons of political advantage, a practice which might be described as “serial monogamy.” Exactly how the second marriage affected Ælfgifu’s status as Cnut’s first consort is unknown, but there is no evidence to suggest that she was repudiated.

After Cnut’s death in 1035, the English throne fell to Harold Harefoot, Cnut’s son by his first wife, while Harthacnut, his son by Emma, became king in Denmark.

Harold captured one of Emma’s sons who came over from Normandy and had his eyes burned out with hot pokers so that he would be unable to challenge him for the throne (he died from his wounds). When Harold died after reigning for 5 years, his half brother Harthacnut became king in 1040. He dug up Harold’s body and threw him in a fen and then into the River Thames.

Harthacnut’s half-brother Edward was proclaimed king after Harthacnut’s death in June 1042.

Edward married Edith the daughter of the most powerful earl in England, but they had no children. After Edward died, his brother-in-law Harold Godwinson became king, but he wouldn’t be for long.

Did you manage to keep everyone straight? 😉 Someone should make a movie about all of the above!

Harold meeting Edward shortly before Edward’s death

William the Conqueror (ruled from 1066 to 1087)

In the 1050s and early 1060s, William, the Duke of Normandy, became a contender for the throne of England held by the childless Edward the Confessor, who was his first cousin once removed. Arguing that Edward had previously promised the throne to him and that Harold had sworn to support his claim, William built a large fleet and invaded England in September 1066. He decisively defeated and killed Harold at the Battle of Hastings on 14 October 1066. After further military efforts, William was crowned king on Christmas Day, 1066, in London.

There is a minor sexual reference in the following video:

William’s conquest of England changed it forever. England was no longer linked to the Danes. The Saxon nobles were replaced with Normans, the feudal system was imposed, castles were built to help the Normans maintain control and prevent rebellions, and the English language changed. One historian stated, “no country in Europe, between the rise of the barbarian kingdoms and the 20th century, has undergone so radical a change in so short a time as England experienced after 1066.”

The Crusades

The Crusades were a series of invasions of the Middle East by Europeans in the name of Christianity. They went on, periodically, for centuries. They resulted in a shift in the identity of Latin Christianity, great financial benefits to certain parts of Europe, and many instances of horrific carnage. 

The Crusades serve as one of the iconic points of transition from the early Middle Ages to the high Middle Ages, in which the localized, barter-based economy of Europe transitioned toward a more dynamic commercial economic system.

The background to the Crusades was the power of a specific group of nomadic warriors in the Middle East, that of the Seljuk Turks.  The Seljuks were fierce fighters, trained by their background as steppe nomads and raiders, who had converted to Islam prior to the eleventh century.  The Seljuks were a tribal confederation, not a united kingdom or empire, and they invaded Muslim kingdoms as often as Christian ones.  Despite their lack of political unity they proved even more deadly foes to the Byzantine Empire than had the Arab caliphates, and by late in the eleventh century the Byzantine emperor Alexius called for aid from the Christians of western Europe, despite the ongoing divide between the Latin and Orthodox churches.

Tughril Bey - the founder of the Seljuk Empire
Tughril Bey – the founder of the Seljuk Empire
Europe on the eve of the First Crusade
Europe on the eve of the First Crusade

In 1095, Pope Urban II responded by giving a sermon in France summoning the knights of Europe to holy war to protect Christians in and near the Holy Land.  Urban spoke of the supposed atrocities committed by the Turks, the richness of the lands that European knights might expect to seize, and the righteousness of the cause of aiding fellow Christians.  The idea caught on much faster and much more thoroughly than Urban could have possibly expected; knights from all over Europe responded when the news reached them. The idea was so appealing that not only knights, but thousands of commoners responded, forming a “people’s crusade” that marched off for Jerusalem, for the most part without weapons, armor, or adequate supplies.  

Peter the Hermit Preaching the First Crusade
Peter the Hermit Preaching the First Crusade
A charismatic monk and powerful orator named Peter the Hermit was the spiritual leader of the People’s Crusade movement. He was known for riding a donkey and dressing in simple clothing. He had vigorously preached the crusade throughout northern France and Flanders.

The peasant population had been afflicted by drought, famine, and disease for many years before 1096, and some of them seem to have envisioned the crusade as an escape from these hardships. Spurring them on had been a number of meteorological occurrences beginning in 1095 that seemed to be a divine blessing for the movement: a meteor shower, aurorae, a lunar eclipse, and a comet, among other events.

The response was beyond expectations: while Urban might have expected a few thousand knights, he ended up with a migration numbering up to 100,000 Crusaders of mostly unskilled fighters, including women and children.

Map of the People’s Crusade – Click to see it larger.

Much of the impulse of the Crusades came from the fact that Urban II offered unlimited penance to the crusaders, meaning that anyone who took part in the crusade would have all of their sins absolved; furthermore, pilgrims were now allowed to be armed.  Thus, the crusades were the first armed Christian pilgrimage, and in fact, the first “official” Christian holy war in the history of the religion.  In addition to the promise of salvation, and equally important to many of the knights who flocked to the crusading banner, was the promise of loot (and, again, Urban’s speech explicitly promised the crusaders wealth and land). 

Many of the crusaders were minor lords or landless knights, men who had few prospects back home but now had the chance to make something of themselves in the name of liberating the Holy Land.  Thus, most crusaders combined ambition and greed with genuine Christian piety.

A knight armed with virtues and facing the vices in mortal combat. The parts of his armor are identified with Christian virtues, thus correlating essential military equipment with the religious values of chivalry.
A knight armed with virtues and facing the vices in mortal combat. The parts of his armor are identified with Christian virtues, thus correlating essential military equipment with the religious values of chivalry.

The backbone of the crusades were the knightly orders: organizations of knights authorized by the church to carry out wars in the name of Christianity.  These orders came into being after the First Crusade, originally organized to provide protection to Christian pilgrims visiting the Holy Land. 

They were made up of “monk-knights” who took monastic vows (i.e. of obedience, poverty, and chastity) but spent their time fighting as well as praying.  The concept already existed at the start of the crusading period, but the orders grew quickly thanks to their involvement in the invasions.  Two orders in particular, the Hospitallers and the Templars, would go on to achieve great wealth and power despite their professed vows of poverty.


The First Four Crusades Including the Reconquista

The First Crusade (1095 – 1099), which lasted only four years following the initial declaration by Pope Urban, was amazingly successful. What had once been the great power of the Middle East, the Abbasid Caliphate, had long since splintered apart, with rival kingdoms holding power in North Africa and the Middle Ages.  The doctrinal differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims further divided the Muslim ummah (community of believers). In addition, the Arab kingdoms battled the Seljuk Turks, who were intent on conquering everything, not just Christian lands. Thus, the crusaders arrived precisely when the Muslim forces were profoundly divided. By 1099, the crusaders had captured Jerusalem and much of the Levant, forming a series of Christian territories in the heart of the Holy Land.  These were called The Latin Principalities, kingdoms ruled by European knights.

Crusader states are indicated with a red cross ☩. The Byzantine Empire is visible in the west; the Seljuk Empire and Fatimid Egypt are shown in light green and dark green respectively.
Crusader states are indicated with a red cross ☩. The Byzantine Empire is visible in the west; the Seljuk Empire and Fatimid Egypt are shown in light green and dark green respectively.

After their success in taking Jerusalem, the knightly orders became very powerful and very rich. They not only seized loot, but became caravan guards and, ultimately, money-lenders (the Templars became bankers after abandoning the Holy Land when Jerusalem was lost in 1187).  Essentially, the major orders came to resemble armed merchant houses as much as monasteries, and there is no question that many of their members did a very poor job of living up to their vows of poverty, obedience, and chastity.

Representation of a Knight Templar
Representation of a Knight Templar

 Likewise, the rulers of the Latin Principalities made little effort to win over their Muslim and Jewish subjects.

Subsequent crusades were much less successful. The problem was that, once they had formed their territories, the westerners had to hold on to them with little but a series of strong forts up and down the coast. The European population centers were obviously hundreds or thousands of miles away and the local people were mostly Jews and Muslims who detested the cruel invaders.  While generations of Europeans continued to regard crusading as a worthwhile endeavor, that enthusiasm did ebb over time as the crusades came to resemble conventional invasions more so than genuine holy wars.

Attacks on the Latin Principalities resulted in the Second Crusade, which lasted from 1147 – 1149.  The Second Crusade consisted of two crusades that happened simultaneously: some European knights sailed off to the Holy Land, while others fought against the Cordoban Caliphate in the Iberian Peninsula. 

The Europeans ultimately lost ground in the Middle East but managed to retake Lisbon in Portugal from the Muslim Caliphate there.  In fact, the Second Crusade’s significance is that crusaders began to wage an almost ceaseless war against the Cordoban Caliphate in Spain – in a sense, Christian Europeans, particularly the inhabitants of the Christian kingdoms of northern Spain, concluded that there were plenty of infidels much closer to home than Jerusalem and its environs.

Moors and Christians battle
Moors and Christians battle

These wars of Christians against Spanish Muslims were called the Spanish “Reconquest” (Reconquista), and they lasted until the last Muslim kingdom fell in 1492 CE.

Note: There are a couple of curse words in the following video:


In 1187 an Egyptian Muslim general named Salah-ad-Din (his name is normally anglicized as Saladin) retook Jerusalem after crushing the crusaders at the Battle of Hattin. This prompted the Third Crusade (1189 – 1192), a massive invasion led by the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire (Frederick Barbarossa), the king of France (Philip II), and the king of England (Richard I – known as “The Lion-Hearted”). It completely failed, with the English king negotiating a peace deal with Saladin after Frederick died (he drowned trying to cross a river) and Philip returned to France.  After this, only a few small territories remained in Christian hands.

If you like thick historical novels, these books by Sharon Kay Penman are set during this time period in England and France (and the last 2 in the series are about Richard the Lionheart and the Crusades). Note: These books were written for adults. They may contain mature content.

In When Christ and His Saints Slept, a book that tells the story of Henry II, Eleanor of Aquitaine, and their children, master storyteller and historian Sharon Kay Penman illuminates one of the less-known but fascinating periods of English history. It begins with the death of King Henry I, son of William the Conqueror and father of Maude, his only living legitimate offspring.

Time and Chance (Plantagenets Book 2)
Devil’s Brood (Plantagenets Book 3)
Lionheart (Plantagenets Book 4)
A King’s Ransom (Plantagenets Book 5)

Arguably the most disastrous (in terms of failing to achieve its stated goal of controlling the Holy Land) crusade was the Fourth Crusade, lasting from 1199 – 1204.  This latest attempt to seize Jerusalem began with a large group of crusaders chartering passage with Venetian sailors, long since accustomed to profiting from crusader traffic.  En route, the crusaders and sailors learned of a succession dispute in Constantinople and decided to intervene.  The intervention turned into an outright invasion, with the crusaders carrying out a horrendously bloody sack of the ancient city.  In the end, the crusaders set up a Latin Christian government that lasted for about fifty years while completely ignoring their original goal of sailing to the Holy Land.  The only lasting effect of the Fourth Crusade was the further weakening of Byzantium in the face of Turkish invaders in the future.  To emphasize the point: Christian knights from Western Europe set out to attack the Muslim kingdoms of the Middle East but ended up conquering a Christian kingdom, and the last political remnant of the Roman Empire at that, instead.

Many further crusades followed; popes would continue to authorize official large-scale invasions of the Middle East until the end of the thirteenth century, and the efforts of Christian knights in Spain during the Reconquest very much carried on the crusading tradition for centuries.  Later crusades were often nothing more than politically-motivated power grabs on the part of popes, launched against a given pope’s political opponents (i.e. fellow European Christians who happened to be at odds with a pope).

None of the latter crusades succeeded in seizing land in the Middle East, but they did inspire a relentless drive to overthrow and destroy the now centuries-old Muslim kingdom of Spain, as noted above.

Consequences of the Crusades

The crusades had numerous consequences and effects.  Three were particularly important.  First, the city-states of northern Italy, especially Venice, Genoa, and Pisa, grew rich transporting goods and crusaders back and forth between Europe and the Middle East.  As the transporters, merchants, and bankers of crusading expeditions, it was northern Italians that derived the greatest financial benefit from the invasions.  The crusades provided so much capital that the northern Italian cities evolved to become the banking center of Europe and the site of the Renaissance starting in the fifteenth century.

Italian city-states
Italian city-states

Second, the ideology surrounding the crusades was to inspire European explorers and conquerors for centuries. The most obvious instance of this phenomenon was the Reconquest of Spain, which was explicitly seen through the lens of the crusading ideology at the time.  In turn, the Reconquest was completed in 1492, precisely the same year that Christopher Columbus arrived in the Americas.  With the subsequent invasions of South and Central America by the Spanish, the crusading spirit, of spreading Catholicism and seizing territory at the point of a sword, lived on. 

Third, there was a new concern with a particularly intolerant form of religious purity among many Christian Europeans during and after the Crusades.  One effect of this new focus was numerous outbreaks of anti-Semitic violence in Europe; many crusaders attacked Jewish communities in Europe while the crusaders were on their way to the Holy Land, and anti-Jewish laws were enacted by many kings and lords inspired by the fervent, intolerant new brand of Christian identity arising from the Crusades.  Thus, going forward, European Christianity itself became harsher, more intolerant, and more warlike because of the Crusades.

The Northern Crusades and the Teutonic Knights

Often overlooked in considerations of the crusades were the “Northern Crusades” – invasions of the various Baltic regions of northeastern Europe (i.e. parts of Denmark, northern Germany, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and Finland) between 1171, when the Pope Alexander III authorized a crusade against the heathens of the east Baltic region, and the early fifteenth century, when the converted kingdoms and territories of the Baltic began to seize independence from their crusading overlords: the Teutonic Knights.

Map of the branches of the Teutonic Order in Europe around 1300. Shaded area is sovereign territory, Grand Master HQ in Venice is highlighted
Map of the branches of the Teutonic Order in Europe around 1300. Shaded area is sovereign territory, Grand Master HQ in Venice is highlighted

The Teutonic Knights were a knightly order founded during the Third Crusade at a hospital in the Latin city of Acre. They were closely modeled after the Templars, adopting their “rule” (their code of conduct) and spending most of the twelfth century crusading in the Holy Land. Their focus shifted, however, in the middle of the century when they began leading crusades against the pagan peoples of the eastern Baltic, including the Lithuanians, Estonians, Finns, and other groups.

A Teutonic Knight on the left and a Swordbrother on the right.
A Teutonic Knight on the left and a Swordbrother on the right.
Baltic Tribes 1200

The Baltic lands were the last major region of Europe to remain pagan.  Neither Latin nor Orthodox missionaries had made significant headway in converting the people of the region, outside of the border region between the lands of the Rus and the Baltic Sea.  Thus, the Teutonic Knights could make a very plausible case for their Crusades as analogous to the Spanish Reconquest, and the Teutonic Knights proved very savvy at placing agents in the papal court that worked to maintain papal support for their efforts.

The Teutonic Order ultimately outlasted the other crusading orders by centuries. The order was very successful at drumming up support from European princes and knights, relying on annual expeditions of visiting warriors to do most of the fighting while the Teutonic Knights themselves literally held down the fort in newly-built castles. They were authorized by various popes not only to conquer and convert, but to rule over the peoples of the east Baltic, and thus by the thirteenth century the Teutonic Knights were in the process of conquering and ruling Prussia, parts of Estonia, and a region of southeastern Finland and present-day Lithuania called Livonia.

These kingdoms lasted a remarkably long time; the Teutonic Order ruled Livonia until 1561, when it was finally ousted.  Thus, for several centuries, the map of Europe included the strange spectacle of a theocratic state: one ruled directly by monk-knights, with no king, prince, or lord above them.

The Northern Crusades were, in some ways, as important as the crusades to the Holy Land in that they were responsible for extinguishing the last remnants of paganism in Europe – it was truly gone by the late fourteenth century in Lithuania, Estonia, and Livonia – and in conquering a large territory that would one day be a core part of Germany itself: Prussia.

The Middle East After the Caliphates

The irony of the crusades to the Holy Land is that the vast majority of people who lived in the Middle East did not think of politics in terms of Muslim versus Christian (or Jewish) identity.  The fairly brief and ephemeral period of political unity under the Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates that saw most of the Middle East and North Africa united under the rule of “caliphs” (political successors to the prophet Muhammad) was gone by the time the first European crusaders arrived.  In turn, despite disrupting and transforming the Holy Land itself for time, the crusades had little overall impact on the societies of the Middle East themselves.  Those societies represented a cross-section of ethnic, religious, and regional identities that underwent major transformations in the period of the High Middle Ages.

By the time the last Abbasid caliph was murdered by the Mongols in 1258 the caliphate itself had long degenerated into a legal fiction.  The caliphs themselves had become honored prisoners of more powerful invading forces starting in 945, and the territories of the former caliphate were divided between numerous sultans, an Arabic word that simply means “ruler.”  Many of those sultans petitioned for recognition from the captive caliphs as a form of spiritual and political currency, but the bottom line is that the caliphs themselves exercised no political authority of their own.

This was not, however, a period of stagnation in the Middle East and North Africa.  First and foremost, the culture of learning that had blossomed during the Abbasid period continued to prosper.  Expressed in both Arabic and  “New Persian,” Persian (the vernacular language of Iran, which is the same thing as Persia) written in Arabic script, scholarship in fields as diverse as theology and astronomy was supported by numerous sultans.  Persian became the international language of both scholarship and poetry during this period, with major works being written in Persian from northern India to Anatolia by writers of a diverse range of ethnic backgrounds.  In fact, it was not until the nineteenth century that writers drifted away from Persian as the “default” language of learning.  In that way, Persian was something of a parallel to Latin in Europe, with the major difference being that (unlike Latin) Persian remained a living language spoken by millions of people.

In addition to scholarship and literature, commerce thrived in the post-caliphate Middle East.  Almost without exception, elites went out of their way to actively encourage trade by building and policing trade routes and founding caravanserais, fortified waystations for mercantile travelers. 

One of the best-preserved examples of a caravanserai in Cairo
One of the best-preserved examples of a caravanserai in Cairo

In contrast to the contempt for merchants felt by most elite Europeans at the time, merchants were an honored part of Persian, Turkic, and Arabic societies.  The result was a thriving commercial economy across most of the region, although it is important to bear in mind that most people were still farmers in the Middle East just as they were everywhere else in the pre-modern world.

The Turkic Migrations and Ottoman Origins

By far the most important and far-reaching event in the Middle East during the post-caliphate period was the arrival of the Turks.  As noted above, the group known as the Seljuks migrated from Central Asia starting in earnest in the tenth century CE, settling from Afghanistan to Anatolia over the course of the following centuries.  The Turks were nomadic warriors organized into tribal confederations (the Seljuks were simply the leading tribe rather than the actual rulers during the first wave of migration), effective in warfare but generally poor at establishing stable governments.  A series of Turkic dynasties across the region began in 998 under the Ghaznavids in Persia, but the history of those dynasties is a litany of invasion, assassination, and collapse, typically after a few generations of shaky rule.

Where Turkic dynasties were able to establish a stable rule for at least a century it was usually thanks to the infusion of Persian traditions of statecraft.  The Seljuk dynasty that overthrew the Ghaznavids in 1040 drew on the long history of effective Persian administration to build up an actual government (rather than just meetings of tribal leaders) and to financially support the building projects associated with Islamic civilization like madrasas (schools for instruction in the Koran and Islamic law) and public baths.  Likewise, as the Seljuks encroached on Byzantine territory to the west, the first stable Turkic state there – the Sultanate of Rum (Rome) – relied heavily on Persian administrators and Persian political traditions.  

The greatest literary work of medieval Islam was in Persian, the poet Firdausi’s (d. 1020) Shahnamah, a mythologized account of Persian rulers reaching back to the ancient past that suggested a single cultural and political tradition.  Even though they were not ethnically Persian, Turkic rulers embraced this idea of historical sovereignty, seeing themselves as the inheritors of over a thousand years of Persian rule.  Simply put, Persian political culture was crucial in creating actual states out of tribal confederations, although it is important to acknowledge that many of those states were not especially long-lived during the medieval period.

Unfortunately for the Turkic dynasties at the time and for millions of ordinary people across the Middle East, the Mongol invasions of the thirteenth century devastated much of the region.  By 1256 the Seljuk territories had been crushed by the Mongols and a decades-long period of brutal exploitation and pillaging ensued.  The Mongols established a kingdom known as the Il-Khanate in Persia in 1256, but it took until 1295 for the Mongol ruler Ghazan, the first to convert to Islam, to shift Mongol priorities away from plundering expeditions to more conventional rulership and taxation. 

The Ilkhanate at its greatest extent
The Ilkhanate at its greatest extent

While Egypt fought off the Mongols, most of the rest of the Middle East either experienced harsh Mongol rule itself or political fragmentation as a side effect of the invasions.

It was in the aftermath of the Mongol invasions that the Ottoman Turks began their ascent to power.  Starting as nothing more than a small Turkic beglik (sultanate), the Turks defeated a Byzantine army in 1302 and seized part of Anatolia.  Over the next few decades they built up a formidable reputation as ghazis, holy warriors, but they also made a point of taking over the lands of former Byzantine subjects without inflicting excessive destruction or cruelty (to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike).  In 1352 they took control of a key fortress near Constantinople, and from there they launched a stunning series of invasions in Greece and the Balkans.  In the process, Byzantium was reduced to a pitiful fragment of its former glory, holding on to the city of Constantinople and its hinterlands but otherwise surrounded by Ottoman territories. Constantinople was finally defeated in 1453.

The Emergence of the High Middle Ages in Europe

The Middle East during the period of the crusades was already a prosperous and sophisticated, albeit politically splintered, region.  Europe at the time was also politically disunited, and it had much further to climb in terms of wealth, scholarship, and commerce.  Europe began a long period of transformation and growth starting in about 1000 CE that resulted in significant economic expansion, demographic growth, and cultural achievement.

The early Middle Ages, from about 500 CE – 800 CE, operated largely on the basis of subsistence agriculture and a barter economy.  Economies were almost entirely local; local lords and kings extracted wealth from peasants, but because there was nowhere to sell a surplus of food, peasants tended to grow only as much as they needed to survive, using methods that went unchanged for centuries.  There was a limited market for luxury goods even among those wealthy enough to afford them, and the only sources of reliable minted coins were over a thousand miles away, in Byzantium, Persia, and the Arab kingdoms.

This descent into subsistence had happened for various reasons over the course of the earlier centuries.  The fall of the western empire of Rome had strangled the manufacture and trade in high-quality consumer goods (a trade that had been very extensive in Rome).  Centuries of banditry, raids, and wars made long-distance travel perilous.  In turn, the simple lack of markets meant that there was no incentive to grow more than was needed, and the nobility sought to become more wealthy and powerful not by concerning themselves with agricultural productivity (let alone commerce), but by raiding one another’s lands.

Europe had enjoyed brief periods of relative stability earlier, culminating around 800 CE during Charlemagne’s rise to power.  During the rest of the ninth and tenth centuries, however, the invasions of the Magyars, Saracens, and Vikings had undermined the stability of the fragile political order created by the Carolingians.  Many accounts written at the time, almost exclusively by priests and monks, decried the constant warfare of the period, including the wars caused by invaders from beyond the European heartland and those between European rulers themselves. 

Things started to change around the year 1000 CE.  The major causes for these changes were twofold: the end of full-scale invasions from outside of the core lands of Europe, and changes in agriculture that seem very simple from a contemporary perspective, but were revolutionary at the time. 

The Medieval Agricultural Revolution

In 600 CE, Europe had a population of approximately 14 million.  By 1300 it was 74 million.  That 500% increase was due to two simple changes: the methods by which agriculture operated and the ebb in large-scale violence brought about by the end of foreign invasions.  The first factor in the dramatic increase in population was the simple cessation of major invasions.  With relative social stability, peasants were able to consistently plant and harvest crops and not see them devoured by hungry troops or see their fields trampled.   Those invasions stopped because the Vikings went from being raiders to becoming members of settled European kingdoms, the Magyars likewise took over and settled in present-day Hungary, and the Saracens were beaten back by increasingly savvy southern-European kingdoms.  Warfare between states in Europe remained nearly constant, and banditry still commonplace in the countryside, but it appears that the overall levels of violence did drop off over the course of the eleventh century.

Simultaneously, important changes were underway in agricultural technology.  Early medieval farmers had literally scratched away at the soil with light plows, usually drawn by oxen or donkeys.  Plows were like those used in ancient Rome: the weight of the plow was carried in a pole that went across the animal’s neck.  Thus, if the load was too heavy the animal would simply suffocate.  In turn, that meant that only relatively soft soils could be farmed, limiting the amount of land that could be made arable.  

A series of inventions led to dramatic changes.  Someone (we have no way of knowing who) developed a new kind of collar for horses and oxen that rested on the shoulders of the animal and thus allowed it to draw much heavier loads, enabling the use of heavier plows. 

Medieval plow horses. The lead horse has a breast collar; the rear horse wears a horsecollar.
Medieval plow horses. The lead horse has a breast collar; the rear horse wears a horsecollar.

Those plows were called carruca: a plow capable of digging deeply into the soil and turning it over, bringing air into the topsoil and refreshing its mineral and nutrient content.  Simultaneously, iron horseshoes became increasingly common, which dramatically increased the ability of horses to produce usable muscle power, and iron plowshares proved capable of digging through the soil with greater efficiency. 

A carrucate was named after the carruca plow. The Danelaw carucates were subdivided into eighths: oxgangs or bovates based on the area a single ox could till in a year. In the rest of England, the land was reckoned in hides which were divided into four yardlands, later known as virgates (the amount of land that represented the amount of land sufficient to support a household – traditionally 120 acres).

In addition to the increase in available animal power thanks to those innovations, farmers started to take advantage of new techniques that greatly increased the output of the fields themselves.  Up to that point, European farmers tended to employ two-field crop rotation, planting a field while leaving another “fallow” to recover its fertility for the next year.  This system was sustainable but limited the amount of crops that could be grown.  Starting around 1000 CE, farmers became more systematic about employing three-field crop rotation: working with three linked fields, they would plant one with wheat, one either with legumes (peas, beans, lentils) or barley, and leave one fallow, allowing animals to graze on its weeds and leftover stalks from the last season, with their manure helping to fertilize the soil.  After harvest, farmers would rotate: the fallow field would be planted with grain, the grain with legumes, and the legume field left fallow.  This process dramatically enriched the soil by returning nutrients to it directly with legumes or at least allowing it to naturally recover while it lay fallow.  Thus, the overall yields of edible crops dramatically increased.  Likewise, with the greater variety, the actual nutritional content of food became better.

We’re going to jump WAY ahead in history for a minute to see how Washington Carver discovered this same principle of crop rotation and legumes that was used in the Middle Ages and to learn a bit of botany/science:

Finally, starting in earnest in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, windmills and watermills became increasingly common for grinding grain into usable flour.  The difference in speed between hand-grinding grain and using a mill was dramatic – it could take most of a day to grind enough flour to bake bread for a family, but a mill could grind fifty pounds of grain in less than a half hour.  While peasants resented having to pay for access to mills (which were generally controlled by landowners, often nobles or the Church), the enormous increase in productivity meant that much more food was available overall.  Thus, mills were still cost effective for peasants, and milled flour became the norm across most of Europe by the end of the twelfth century.

The medieval agricultural revolution had tremendous long-term consequences for peasants and, ultimately, for all of European society  Thanks to the increase in animal power and the effects of crop rotation, existing fields became far more productive.  Whole new areas were opened to cultivation, thanks to the ability of the carruca to cut through rocky soil  As a result, there was a major expansion between 1000 – 1300 from the middle latitudes of Europe farther north and east, as the farming population took advantage of the new technology (and growing population) to clear and cultivate what had been forest, scrub, or swamp.  In turn, the existence of a surplus encouraged lords to convert payment in kind (i.e. taxes and rents paid in actual foodstuffs and livestock) to cash rent. Likewise, the relative stability allowed smaller kingdoms to mint their own coins, and over the course of a century or so (c. 1000 – 1100) much of Europe became a cash economy rather than a barter economy.  This gave peasants an added incentive to cultivate as much as possible.  

Peasants actually did very well for themselves in these centuries; they were often able to bargain with their lords for stabilized rents, and a fairly prosperous class of landowning peasants emerged that enjoyed traditional rights vis-à-vis the nobility.  Thus, the centuries between 1000 CE – 1300 CE were relatively good for many European peasants.  Later centuries would be much harder for them.  As an aside, it is important to bear in mind that the progressive view of history, namely the idea that “things always get better over time” is actually factually wrong for much of history, as reflected in the lives of peasants in the Middle Ages and early modern period.

Cities and Economic Change

King Charles V enters the gates of Paris in 1358
King Charles V enters the gates of Paris in 1358

The increase in population tied to the agricultural revolution had another consequence: beyond simply improving life for peasants and increasing family size, it led to the growth of towns and cities.  Even though most peasants never left the area they were born in, many did migrate to the nearest towns and cities and try to make a life there; serfs (unfree peasants) who made it to a town and stayed a year and day were even legally liberated from having to return to the farm.  Likewise, whole families and even villages migrated in search of new lands to farm, generally speaking to the east and north as noted above.

This period saw the rebirth of urban life.  Not since the fall of Rome had most towns and cities consisted of more than just central hubs of local trade with a few thousand inhabitants.  By the twelfth century, however, many cities were expanding rapidly, sometimes by as much as six times in the course of a few centuries.  Likewise, the leaders of these cities were often merchants who grew rich on trade, rather than traditional landowning lords.   

Even as the agricultural revolution laid the foundation for growth and the cities took advantage of it, other factors led to the economic boom of this period.  Lords created new roads and repaired Roman ones from 1,000 years earlier, which allowed bulk trade to travel more cheaply and effectively.  More important than bulk goods, however, were luxury goods, a trade almost entirely controlled by the Italian cities during this period.  Caravans arrived in the Middle East from China and Central Asia and sold goods to Italian merchants waiting for them.  From the Black Sea Region and what was left of Byzantium, the Italians then transported these goods back to the west.  Silk and spices were worth far more than their weight in gold, and their trade created the foundation for early financial markets and banks.  

Trade networks emerged not only linking Italy to the Middle East but southern to northern Europe.  In the Champagne region of France annual fairs brought merchants together to trade their goods.  German rivers saw the growth of towns and cities on their banks where goods were exchanged.  Starting in the twelfth century, the German city of Lubeck became the capital of the Hanseatic League, a group of cities engaged in trade that came together to regulate exchange and maintain monopolies on goods.

Map of the Hanseatic League, showing principal Hanseatic cities
Map of the Hanseatic League, showing principal Hanseatic cities

The social consequences were dramatic and widespread, yet the status of merchants in European society was troubled.  They were resented by the poor (still the vast majority of the population), often held in contempt by traditional land-owning nobles, and frequently condemned by the Church.  Usury, the practice of lending money and charging interest, was classified as a sin by the Church even though the Church itself had to borrow money and pay interest constantly.  Likewise, anti-Semitic stereotypes about Jews as greedy and ruthless arose from the simple fact that dealing in money and money-lending was one of the only professions Jews were allowed to pursue in most medieval kingdoms and cities. Christian Europeans needed loans (as it happens, loans and banking are essential to a functioning cash economy), but despised the Jews they got those loans from – hence the origins of some of the longest-lasting anti-Semitic stereotypes.

Even though cities did not “fit” in the medieval worldview very well, even the most conservative kings had to recognize the economic strength of the new cities.  Just as peasants had been able to negotiate for better treatment, large towns and cities received official town charters from kings in return for stable taxation.  In many cases, cities were practically politically independent, although they generally had to acknowledge the overall authority of the king or local lord.

The growth in trade did not, however, create a real “market economy” in the modern sense.  For one thing, skilled trades were closely regulated by craft guilds, which maintained legal monopolies.  Monopolies were granted to guilds by kings, lords, or city governments, and anyone practicing a given trade who was not a member of the corresponding guild could be fined, imprisoned, or expelled. Guilds jealously guarded the skills and tools of their trades – everything from goldsmithing to barrel making was controlled by guilds.  Guilds existed to ensure that their members produced quality goods, but they also existed to keep out outsiders and to make the “masters” who controlled the guilds wealthy. 


The feudal system flourished in the High Middle Ages.  While it had its origins in the centuries after the collapse of the western Roman Empire, the formal system of vassals receiving land grants by pledging military service to kings (or, increasingly, in return for cash payments in lieu of military service) really came of age in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.  The lords themselves presided over a rigidly hierarchical social and political system in which one’s vocation was largely determined by birth, and the vocation of the nobility was clearly defined by landowning and making war.

Lords – meaning land-owning nobles – lived in “manors,” a term that denoted not only their actual houses but the lands they owned.  All of the peasants on their lands owed them rent, originally in the form of crops but eventually in cash, as well as a certain amount of labor each year.  Peasants were subdivided into different categories, including the relatively-well off independent yeomen and freeholders, who owned their own plots of land, down to the serfs, semi-free peasants tied to the land, and then the cottagers, who were the landless peasants worse-off even than serfs. 

A  medieval manor house in Oxfordshire, England
A “textbook example” medieval manor house in Oxfordshire, England

The system of land-ownership and the traditional rights enjoyed by not just lords, but serfs and freeholders who lived under the lords, is referred to as “manorialism,” the rural political and economic system of the High Middle Ages as a whole. 

One of the traditional rights, and a vital factor in the lives of peasants, were the commons: lands not officially controlled by anyone that all people had a right to use.  The commons provided firewood, grazing land, and some limited trapping of small animals, collectively serving as a vital “safety net” for peasants living on the edge of subsistence.  Access to the commons was not about written laws, but instead the traditional, centuries-old agreements that governed the interactions between different social classes.  Eventually, peasants would find their access to the commons curtailed by landowning nobles intent on converting them to cash-producing farms, but for the medieval period itself, the peasants continued to enjoy the right to their use.  

Map of a medieval manor. Notice the commons.
Map of a medieval manor. Notice the commons.

The kingdoms of Europe up to this point were barely unified.  In many cases, kings were simply the most powerful nobles, men who extracted pledges of loyalty from their subjects but whose actual authority was limited to their personal lands.  Likewise, kings in the early Middle Ages were largely itinerant, moving from place to place all year long.  They had to make an annual circuit of their kingdoms to ensure that their powerful vassals would stay loyal to them; a vassal ignored for too long could, and generally did, simply stop acknowledging the lordship of his king.  Those patterns started to change during the High Middle Ages, and the first two kingdoms to show real signs of centralization were France and England.

In France, a series of kings named Philip (I through IV) ruled from 1060 to 1314 (the House of Capet – or Capetian Dynasty), building a strong administrative apparatus complete with royal judges who were directly beholden to the crown.  The kings ruled the region around Paris (called the Île-de-France, meaning the “island of France”), but their influence went well beyond it as they extended their holdings.  Philip IV even managed to seize almost complete control of the French Church, defying papal authority.  He also proved incredibly shrewd at creating new taxes and in attacking and seizing the lands and holdings of groups like the French Jewish community and the Knights Templar, both of whom he ransacked (the assault on the Knights Templar started in 1307).

In England, the line descending from William the Conqueror (following his invasion in 1066) was also effective in creating a relatively stable political system.  All land was legally the king’s, and his nobles received their lands as “fiefs,” essentially loans from the crown that had to be renewed for payments on the death of a landholder before it could be inherited.  Henry II (r. 1154 – 1189) created a system of royal sheriffs to enforce his will, created circuit courts that traveled around the land hearing cases, and created a grand jury system that allowed people to be tried by their peers. 

Magna Carta

In 1215, a much less competent king named John signed the Magna Carta (“great charter”) with the English nobility that formally acknowledged the feudal privileges of the nobility, towns and clergy.  The important effect of the Magna Carta was its principle: even the king had to respect the law.  Thereafter English kings began to call the Parliament, a meeting of the Church, nobles, and well-off commoners, in order to get authorization and money for their wars. 

Men and Women’s Roles

Gender standards in medieval Europe were based on a combination of centuries-old social traditions, ancient medical theories, and biblical standards.  Greek and Roman medical ideas, very much the basis of the medieval understanding of human biology, held that women were essentially inferior versions of men: weaker, less intelligent, and suffering from an excess of moist “humors” (the bodily fluids that supposedly formed the foundation of health).

A medieval woman
A medieval woman

Biblical stories were interpreted to show that women were inherently more credulous and sinful, with Eve’s temptation in the Garden of Eden both the origin and the model of female wickedness.  When male writers bothered to write about women, they generally did so with predictable misogyny.  A handful of women writers emerged over the course of the Middle Ages, but since there were almost no opportunities for women to learn Latin (the great exception being the education afforded to some nuns) they were cut off from the world of medieval scholarship.

A medieval couple harvesting fruits
A medieval couple harvesting fruits

That being noted, on a practical level medieval women exercised at least some forms of genuine agency (meaning the ability to make meaningful choices about their own lives).  Legally, women could inherit and own property independently, and in most cases they retained control of the dowry brought to marriage.  Women almost always married younger than men did, meaning there were large numbers of widows in medieval society who generally retained control of their property.  Marriage itself was regarded as a sacred duty: it was one of the seven sacraments that the Church held were essential to spiritual salvation. 

 Marriages were only valid if both parties entered into the marriage willingly, and it is clear that many medieval marriages were genuinely affectionate partnerships despite the fact that medieval society was explicitly patriarchal and despite the prevalence of misogynistic theories about women’s supposed weakness and sinfulness. Likewise, at least some male authors were clearly aware that women were more than capable of wit, independence, and competence.

In daily life women performed a host of crucial economic and social functions.  Medieval society was, after all, completely dependent on agriculture and the vast majority of the population were peasants, with men and women both obliged to work from childhood to old age (which for most people was their late 30s – life expectancy was the early 40s for both men and women).  Farm work was divided between men’s and women’s labor. 

Making cheese
Making cheese

 Men plowed fields, tended the large farm animals, and performed maintenance and construction.  Women gardened, tended the small animals (e.g. poultry), made cheese and ale, and were almost completely responsible for cooking, cleaning, and childcare.This gendered division of labor was never absolute, of course, especially since women did “men’s work” out of necessity whenever men were away in war, were injured or sick, or were otherwise unavailable.  One area that had an obvious negative impact on medieval women was that their work was never done – a man’s workday ended when he returned from the fields, but a woman always had work that needed to be done around the house.

The late medieval poem Piers Plowman paints a picture of the life of the medieval peasant woman:

“Burdened with children and landlords’ rent;
What they can put aside from what they make spinning they spend on housing,
Also on milk and meal to make porridge with
To sate their children who cry out for food
And they themselves also suffer much hunger,
And woe in wintertime, and waking up nights
To rise on the bedside to rock the cradle,
Also to card and comb wool, to patch and to wash,
To rub flax and reel yarn and to peel rushes
That it is pity to describe or show in rhyme
The woe of these women who live in huts;”

Women in more elite social categories also performed important economic tasks, but they were increasingly excluded from the formal institutions of organization and power like craft guilds (i.e. more women worked as skilled artisans before craft guilds cemented their control of production).  The wives of artisans were often artisans themselves, but their work was simply regarded as part of their husbands’ output.  Married noblewomen managed their estates, a necessity considering how closely noblemen’s social identity revolved around warfare, while noble widows sometimes served as formal feudal vassals to more powerful lords, even occasionally leading troops when called into service.

 Still, the expectation was that women in general were to defer to men in almost every case, and even widows often found themselves pressured to remarry (and in the process hand over much of their former independence).  Even queens were usually limited in their access to genuine political power, serving as “queens consort,” wives of kings, with the latter possessing complete political control, far more often than “queens regnant,” rulers in their own right who were able to share power with their royal spouse.


Religious habit of the Celestine Order
Religious habit of the Celestine Order

One special social category within medieval society deserves added attention: the monks and nuns.  Monks and nuns took vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience when they left their normal lives and joined (respectively) monasteries and convents.  They did not, however, have to spend their time attending to the spiritual needs of laypeople (i.e. people outside of the Church), which was the primary function of priests.  Instead, they were to devote themselves to prayer and to useful works, activities that were thought to encourage piety and devotion among the monks and nuns, and which often proved to be extremely profitable to the monasteries and convents themselves.

Monasteries and convents grew to become some of the most important economic institutions in medieval Europe, despite their stated intention of housing people whose full-time job was to pray for the souls of Christians everywhere. 

 Monasteries and convents had to be economically self-sustaining, overseeing both agriculture and crafts on their lands. Over time, activities like overseeing agriculture on monastery lands, brewing beer or making wine, or painstakingly copying the manuscripts of books often became a major focus of life in monasteries and convents.  In essence, many monasteries and convents became the most dynamic and commercially successful institutions in their home regions.  Monks and nuns encouraged innovative new forms of agriculture on their lands, sold products (including textiles and the above-mentioned beer and wine) at a healthy profit, and despite their vows of poverty, successful monasteries and convents became lavishly decorated and luxurious for their inhabitants.

Simultaneously, one way that medieval elites tried to shore up their chances of avoiding eternal damnation was leaving land and wealth in their wills to monasteries and convents. Generations of European elites granted land, in particular, to monasteries and convents during life or as part of their posthumous legacy.  The result was the astonishing statistic that monasteries owned a full 20% of the arable land of Western Europe by the late Middle Ages.


Monasteries and convents were not alone in their wealth.  The upper ranks of the Church – bishops, archbishops, cardinals, and the popes themselves – were almost exclusively drawn from the European nobility.  Lower-ranking churchmen were, in turn, commoners, often drawn from the ranks of the same peasants that they ministered to from one of the small parish churches that dotted the landscape.  All of the wealth that went into the Church, from an obligatory tax called the tithe, was siphoned up to the upper reaches of the institutional Church, and many of the high-level priests lived like princes as a result.

Morality in this setting was, predictably, lax.  Despite the nominal requirement not to marry, many high-level priests lived openly with concubines and equally openly supported their children, seeing their sons set up as landowners or members of the Church in their own right and marrying off daughters to noble families.  Despite the injunction to live simply and avoid luxury, many priests (and monks, and nuns) were greedy and ostentatious; one notorious practice was of bishops or archbishops who controlled and received incomes from many different territories (called “bishoprics”) at once but never actually visited them.  Another practice was of noblemen literally buying positions in the Church for their sons – teenage boys might find themselves appointed bishops thanks to the financial intervention of their fathers, with Church officials pocketing the bribe.  Medieval depictions of hell were full of the image of priests, monks, and nuns all plummeting into the fire to face eternal torment for what a profoundly poor job they had done while alive in living up to the moral demands of their respective vocations.  In other words, medieval laypeople were well aware of how corrupt many in the Church actually were.

In addition, while medieval education and literacy was almost entirely confined to the Church as an institution, many rural priests were at best semi-literate.  All Church services were conducted in Latin, and yet some priests understood Latin only poorly, if at all (it had long since vanished as a vernacular language in Europe).  Thus, some of the very caretakers of Christian belief in medieval society often had a very shallow understanding of what that belief was supposed to consist of theologically.

For all of the Middle Ages, however, the fact that the lay public knew that the Church was corrupt and that many of its members were incompetent was of limited practical importance.  There was no alternative.  Without the Church, without the sacraments only it could offer, without the prayers issued by monks and nuns for the souls of believers, and without its reassurance of a life to come after death, medieval Christians were certain that their eternal souls were damned to hell.  

We want to know what you thought of what you just read and watched! Leave us a comment! Please also let us know if a link or video isn’t working. ?

Next: The Late Middle Ages and Europe (1250-1500)

People’s Crusade map: By me – myslef (derivated from this), Public Domain,

Celestine: By Mangouste35 – Own work, Public Domain,

Elizabeth Woodville: By Unidentified painter – Found on — image taken of one of three original paintings at Windsor; Queen’s College, Cambridge; or Ashmolean Museum, Oxford[1], Public Domain,

Making cheese: By unknown master – book scan, Public Domain,

Harvesting fruits: By Unknown author – book scan, Public Domain,

Medieval woman: By Unknown author – book scan, Public Domain,

Manor system map: By Plan_mediaeval_manor.jpg: William R. Shepherd, Historical Atlas, New York, Henry Holt and Company, 1923derivative work: Hchc2009 (talk) – Plan_mediaeval_manor.jpg, Public Domain,

Charles V entering Paris: By Jean Fouquet –, Public Domain,

Hanseatic League map: By Doc Brown – eigen werk (own work) + Base map from: File:Europein1328.png by Afterword, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Carucate: By derivative work: Unitfreak (talk)Ploughmen_Fac_simile_of_a_Miniature_in_a_very_ancient_Anglo_Saxon_Manuscript_published_by_Shaw_with_legend_God_Spede_ye_Plough_and_send_us_Korne_enow.png: Paul Lacroix – Ploughmen_Fac_simile_of_a_Miniature_in_a_very_ancient_Anglo_Saxon_Manuscript_published_by_Shaw_with_legend_God_Spede_ye_Plough_and_send_us_Korne_enow.png, Public Domain,

Medieval horse team: By User:Gwinva – photograph of ilustration in Wagner, Eduard; Drobiná, Zoroslava; Durdik, Jan; (2000) Medieval Costume, Armour and Weapons, 1350-1450, trans. by Jean Layton, NY: Dover Publications ISBN 0486412407 (first published in 1956 as Kroje, zbroj a zbrane doby predhusitské a husitské; first published in English in 1958 by Andrew Dakers), Public Domain,

Manor house: By The Abbey, Sutton Courtenay – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Ilkhanate map: By Arab League at English Wikipedia – Own work, Public Domain,

Caravanserai: By Sailko – Own work, CC BY 3.0,

Teutonic order 1260: By S. Bollmann – Dieter Zimmerling: Der Deutsche Ritterorden. 2. Auflage 1991. Econ Verlag, Düsseldorf, Wien, New York 1989, ISBN 3-430-19959-XHermann Kindler, Werner Hilgemann: dtv-Atlas zur Weltgeschichte. Lizenzausgabe für Bertelsmann Club HmbH und diverse Buchclubs. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München ohne Jahr. Band 1Geoffrey Barraclough [Hrsg.]: Atlas der Weltgeschichte. Bechtermünz Verlag, Augsburg 1997, ISBN 3-86047-178-3Franklin H. Littell: Atlas zur Geschichte des Christentums. 2. Sonderauflage. Brockhaus Verlag 1989. ISBN 3-417-24606-7Gerhard Ziegler, Walter Heidenreuter: Karten für den Geschichtsunterricht. Volk und Wissen, Berlin 1954.F. W. Putzgers Historischer Schul-Atlas. Ausgabe 1923. www.maproom.orgErnst Bruckmüller, Peter Claus Hartmann: Putzger Historischer Weltatlas. 102. Auflage. Cornelsen 1992.Dr. Richard Andree: Droysens Allgemeiner Historischer Handatlas. www.maproom.orgKarl Spruner, Theodor Menke: Hand-Atlas für die Geschichte des Mittelalters und die neueren Zeit. 3. Auflage. Justus Perthes, Gotha 1880. www.maproom.orgOhne Autor: Abbildung und Beschreibung aller Ritterorden in Europa. Reprint der Originalausgabe von 1792. Reprint-Verlag Leipzig. ISBN 3-8262-1807-8, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Baltic tribes: By MapMaster – Own work based on: a map by Marija Gimbutas, published in The Balts (1963) LCC 63018018. Available at In addition to Gimbutas, other maps were also consulted:”Libiesi Citu Senas Latvijas Cilsu Vidu” (Livonians and other tribes of ancient Latvia 10th – 12th centuries) A map from the Latvijas Enciklopedja[dead link]Map at Emokykla.LTAnother map at Emokykla.LT, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Teutonic knights: By Unknown author – en:Münchener Bilderbogen; file Nr 733., Public Domain,

Italian states: By Map_of_Italy_(1494)-it.svg: F l a n k e rderivative work: Ultimate Destiny (talk) – Map_of_Italy_(1494)-it.svg, Public Domain,

Reconquista: By Alfonso X(Life time: 1221-1284) – Original publication: Cantigas de Santa MariaImmediate source:, PD-US-expired,

Tuetonic order map: By Marco Zanoli (sidonius (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)) – Own work, Karte nach: Grosser Historischer Weltatlas. Bayrischer Schulbuch-Verlag (Hg.). Bd. 2, Mittelalter. München 1970, S. 82., CC BY-SA 4.0,

Saladin: By Cristofano dell’Altissimo – Atlante dell’arte italiana, Public Domain,

Cordoba Caliphate map: By File:Califato de Córdoba – 1000.svg: Tyk (talk · contribs)derivative work: Morningstar1814 (talk · contribs) – File:Califato de Córdoba – 1000.svg, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Knight Templar: By JoJan – Own work – own photo, CC BY 3.0,

Europe on the eve of the First Crusade: By Richard Ishida – r12a@w3.orgThis is a retouched picture, which means that it has been digitally altered from its original version. Modifications: K. of Galicia. Modifications made by One2. – Historical maps: Europe, CC BY-SA 4.0,

Normans info:

Seljuk: By Mux Wolfen – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

People’s Crusade: By Anonymous –, Public Domain,

Crusades image: By anonymus –, Public Domain,

Epte River:,empties%20into%20the%20Seine%20not%20far%20from%20Giverny.

Ethelstan info:

Monet – Waterlillies: By Claude Monet – (no longer live), Public Domain,

Emma of Normandy:


Athelred the Unready:

Knight: By Guilelmus Peraldus, Summa de virtutibus et vitiis –, Public Domain,

William the Conqueror:

Silver penny: By Photographed by: York Museums Trust Staff – This file has been provided by York Museums Trust as part of a GLAMwiki partnership.This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing., CC BY-SA 4.0,

Edmund Ironside: By Unknown author –, Public Domain,


People’s Crusade: By Unknown author – Egerton ms. 1500[1], fol. 45v, Public Domain,

Kingdom of York map: By Ikonact – Bristish islands blank.svgFor the coastline at the time, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Bayeux Tapestry: By Image on web site of Ulrich Harsh. –, Public Domain,

Swen Forkbeard: Public Domain,

Edmund Ironside:

Edward the Elder info:

Crusader states: By MapMaster – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Normandy: By FlyingPC (talk · contribs), Morningstar1814 (talk · contribs) – File:911-1050 duche de normandie.svg, CC BY-SA 4.0,

England 878: By Hel-hama – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Carucate info:

People’s Crusade info:

Seljuk battle map: By Tourskin (talk) 04:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC), based on BigDaddy1204’s maps. – Own work (Original text: self-made), Public Domain,

Edmund Atheling:

This text was adapted (with permission) from:

  • Western Civilization: A Concise History – Volumes 1-3
    by Dr. Christopher Brooks
  • World History Cultures, States, and Societies to 1500
    by Eugene Berger, Ph.D, George L. Israel, Ph.D., Charlotte Miller, Ph.D., Brian Parkinson, Ph.D., Andrew Reeves, Ph.D, and Nadejda Williams, Ph.D.
    CC BY-SA
  • Modern World History
    by Dan Allosso, Bemidji State University and Tom Williford, Southwest Minnesota State University

I’ve taken excerpts from the above-mentioned resources and heavily edited and added to them for my intended audience. While I’ve received permission to use/adapt these books, none of the above endorses Guest Hollow or my use of their materials.

Information was also taken from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and other resources (listed in the individual page credits).

This online book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Beowulf the Fox Terrier dog and the Greek & Latin roots graphic © Jennifer Guest

3 thoughts on “The High Middle Ages and Europe (1000 to 1250)

  1. Is the other volume that discusses the “political successors to the prophet Muhammad” the geography text? With current events, I would love to review this.

    1. That sentence in the text should have been removed. It is referrencing one of the texts that goes with one of the ones I used as a base text. (I’m glad you posted about it!!) 🙂 You can read the info referenced here in Western Civilization – A Concise History – Volume 1:
      The info is in the section titled: The Political History of the Arabs After Muhammad.
      I hope this helps!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *